Skip to main content

When Tourism Feels Like Work: Field Notes on Traveling Smarter

You land in a new city. The air smells different. Your phone buzzes—check-in instructions, a restaurant reservation, a reminder to buy museum tickets before they sell out. Travel used to be about getting lost. Now it's about getting through a checklist. Something broke. And it's not just you. Across the industry, the same complaints echo: hidden fees, algorithm-driven pricing, tourist traps that look authentic on Instagram. This isn't a rant. It's a field report—what's actually happening, why it matters, and what you can do about it. The Travel Burnout Epidemic Why Your Vacation Feels Like a Performance Review I watched a woman cry at La Sagrada Familia last spring. Not from awe—because her phone died and she couldn't check the self-guided audio tour she'd pre-downloaded. That moment stuck with me.

You land in a new city. The air smells different. Your phone buzzes—check-in instructions, a restaurant reservation, a reminder to buy museum tickets before they sell out. Travel used to be about getting lost. Now it's about getting through a checklist.

Something broke. And it's not just you. Across the industry, the same complaints echo: hidden fees, algorithm-driven pricing, tourist traps that look authentic on Instagram. This isn't a rant. It's a field report—what's actually happening, why it matters, and what you can do about it.

The Travel Burnout Epidemic

Why Your Vacation Feels Like a Performance Review

I watched a woman cry at La Sagrada Familia last spring. Not from awe—because her phone died and she couldn't check the self-guided audio tour she'd pre-downloaded. That moment stuck with me. Modern tourism has quietly turned into a delivery system of tasks: book the right restaurant at exactly 60 days out, validate your boarding pass before the queue hits, photograph every angle so your Instagram grid doesn't have a gap. The trip itself becomes a checklist, and checklists exhaust you. The tricky part is we blame ourselves—not the system. "I should have planned better." But planning is the problem.

The Rise of the Optimized Trip

Travel companies sell you "effortless itineraries" that require seventeen decisions before breakfast. Every museum slot, every dinner reservation, every transfer window. That sounds fine until you realize you're running a logistics operation from a foreign hotel room. I once spent forty minutes rearranging a single afternoon in Rome because a bus strike meant I'd miss the pasta-making class. The class cost forty euros. The stress cost me a day of actually being in Rome. Who benefits from your exhaustion? Not you. The booking platforms, the guide apps, the curated experience brokers—they profit when you believe a vacation without a spreadsheet is wasted. Wrong order. You arrive somewhere beautiful and immediately hand the controls to an invisible project manager.

Data from airport surveys suggests that roughly two-thirds of leisure travelers report feeling "more tired" returning home than when they left. Not physically tired—that hollow, jittery fatigue you get after three days of meetings. The machinery of a trip demands constant status updates: where is my bag, is the line moving, did the tour confirm, can I squeeze one more landmark in before sunset. One traveler I met in Barcelona had scheduled her beach time in twenty-minute blocks. Twenty minutes. She wasn't there to swim—she was there to clear the next item. That hurts. The beach itself didn't care, but her carefully crafted spreadsheet certainly did.

'We optimize the commute to work. Then we optimize the vacation to escape the commute. The optimization never ends.'

— overheard at a hostel kitchen table, 2023, while someone argued with a rental car app

Who Benefits From Your Exhaustion

The moment you book a trip, a dozen businesses begin competing for your attention—and your compliance. Hotels pressure you into their "experience packages." Airlines dangle upgrades that require checking your app hourly. Even walking tours now come with QR codes and post-trip surveys. The hidden cost is not money. It's the constant low-grade obligation to perform as a tourist correctly. Miss a reservation? You feel guilty. Skip a landmark? You feel wasteful. That guilt is manufactured. It keeps you inside the system, buying the next add-on, the next upgrade, the next curated micro-experience that promises to fix whatever tiredness you're feeling. It won't. The catch is simple: exhaustion sells. Rested people don't impulse-buy skip-the-line passes at 10 PM. Rested people fall asleep. The industry prefers you restless.

What Tourism Actually Sells

The Intangible Promise — You’re Buying a Feeling, Not a Seat

Tourism doesn’t sell flights and hotel keys. That’s just the packaging. What you actually pay for — what the whole industry quietly trades in — is expectation management. A sunrise over Montserrat that matches the Instagram glow, a paella that tastes exactly like the one your neighbor described, a seamless metro transfer that makes you feel like a local. The product is a photograph before you take it. The service is anxiety reduction: someone else navigates the airport chaos, translates the menu, reserves the sun lounger. The tricky part? That promise is brittle. One delayed train, one rude front-desk clerk, one overbooked viewpoint — and the whole illusion cracks. I have watched groups unravel because the wrong bus turned up. Not because they couldn’t reach the hotel, but because the story they’d been sold (effortless discovery) hit a pothole. That’s the real transaction: a contract that says “Your time here will feel smooth.” When it doesn’t, you resent the trip — even if the sights are fine.

‘The brochure sells the cathedral. The actual transaction is about whether you feel stranded or held during the gap between the airport and the selfie.’

— tour operator, speaking off the record about why repeat customers are rare

Experience vs. Commodity — The Trap of the Checklist Holiday

Here’s the split nobody warns you about. An experience demands you show up with nothing but curiosity — you let the city happen to you. A commodity is a prepackaged box: three museums, one sunset boat ride, two recommended restaurants. Most tourism infrastructure (booking platforms, itineraries, influencers) pushes you toward the commodity side.

A mentor explained that however polished the dashboard looks, the pitfall is skipping the failure rehearsal that would have caught the silent assumption on day one.

Wrong order. You arrive at the Sagrada Família already expecting wonder — and wonder doesn’t work on command. The catch is that the industry needs you to treat travel as a product. Products can be priced, reviewed, optimized.

Honestly — most tourism posts skip this.

Operators we shadowed described three distinct failure modes — mis-threaded tension, skipped press tests, and unlabeled batches — each preventable when someone owns the checklist before the rush starts.

Experiences are messy, unpredictable, bad for quarterly earnings. So the system nudges you toward the safe route: book everything, optimize every hour, collect checkmarks. What usually breaks first is your tolerance for spontaneity. I fixed this for my own Barcelona trip by leaving every second afternoon blank — a rule my guidebook called inefficient. That unstructured gap saved the trip. We stumbled into a courtyard concert that no algorithm would have found. The trade-off? You risk boredom. But boredom, in tourism, is the seed of actual memory.

When the Product Is a Photo — and the Pipeline Clogs

Quick reality check — most famous landmarks now operate like assembly lines. You queue for the view, take the required shot, rotate out. The product isn’t the mountain or the mosque; it’s the framed image you post within 24 hours. That sounds fine until forty people are trying to capture the same reflection in the same puddle at the same time. The seam blows out. Everybody leaves frustrated, clutching a photo that looks like everyone else’s. The industry knows this. That’s why they sell “sunrise tickets” and “early-access passes” — they’re charging a premium to manage the expectation of solitude. But that’s a bandage. The real problem is that we treat every destination like a catalog item. We consume the representation, not the place. One rhetorical question to hold onto: would you rather have a perfect picture of a crowded square, or a grainy shot of a backstreet you discovered alone? The system votes for the first. You can vote differently — but you’ll have to stop treating tourism as a delivery service. That hurts. It also works.

The Hidden Machinery of a Trip

The hidden hand you never see

That flight you just booked for €89? Someone else saw it for €134 twenty minutes earlier. Same seat, same route. The machine twitched. Dynamic pricing algorithms don't care about fairness—they care about your willingness to pay, measured in real time against your search history, device type, and how many times you refreshed. I have watched a hotel room climb €60 in the three minutes it took me to check my calendar. The trick is: these systems are built to exploit hesitation. They punish the careful planner and reward the impulse buyer—which is fine, until you realize the 'deal' you grabbed was actually the third price tier they showed you.

Commission structures and kickbacks

Tour guides, hotel concierges, travel agents—most of them take a cut. Not a secret, really, but the opacity stings. That 'recommended' restaurant in Barcelona? The one your hotel front desk circled on a map? They get a commission—often 15–20% of your bill. That walking tour you booked on a third-party site? The guide earns maybe 40% of what you paid. The rest gets split between the platform, the affiliate who clicked you through, and the payment processor. The catch is: the recommendation you trusted was actually a revenue stream. A friend once ran a hostel in Lisbon. He told me the 'free' walking tour companies paid him €8 per guest just to put their flyer on the front desk. Eight euros, for a recommendation that took two seconds. That hurts.

'The review system is just another marketplace. Five-star ratings get bought, traded, and extorted every single day.'

— former TripAdvisor content moderator, off the record

Review manipulation—the quiet rot

What usually breaks first is trust. Fake reviews are not a bug; they're a feature of a system that rewards volume over honesty. I have seen a guesthouse in Granada go from 4.8 stars to 3.2 in six weeks—because the owner refused to pay a 'reputation management' firm that then flooded his page with one-star complaints about 'noise from a construction site 2 km away.' The algorithm can't tell the difference. Worse, the platforms have no incentive to clean house: more reviews mean more engagement, more clicks, more bookings. The traveler loses. You arrive at a 'top-rated' café and find frozen croissants microwaved in a back room. You wonder if you missed something. You didn't. The machinery just worked against you.

The practical upshot? Book direct when you can. Call the hotel. Ask the concierge what they actually eat for breakfast—not what the brochure says. Cross-reference Google Maps reviews with Booking.com reviews and look for the same phrasing used across both. A single copy-pasted sentence in five different accounts? That's a bot farm, not a happy customer. The system won't fix itself—so you have to build your own filter. Next section, I will walk you through a real weekend in Barcelona: the algorithmic version versus the one I fixed by breaking every rule above.

A Weekend in Barcelona: Before and After

The algorithm's itinerary vs. the local's route

I watched a couple on their phones for forty-five minutes outside a Barcelona bakery. They were hunting for something, presumably — thumbs swiping, heads bent, shoulders tight. The bakery was called Forn de Sant Jaume, had been there since 1864, and sold ensaïmadas dusted with sugar that still held the warmth of the oven. They never looked up. That couple was following the algorithm's schedule: tick the must-see on the list, snap the photo, check the map, walk to the next pin. The default itinerary, pulled from a dozen blog roundups and the top of a Google search, had them queuing for Park Güell at 10am (crowded already, ticket scanned from a phone), then rushing to La Boqueria for lunch (overpriced sangría, elbow-to-elbow tourists), then hitting the Gothic Quarter (pushing past the same faces from the queue). By 4pm they looked wrecked — not from the city, but from the logistics. The alternative route, the one a local friend sketched on a napkin over coffee, started at 8am with nothing. Coffee and a pastry at a bar with no English menu. Then a slow walk up to the Carmel bunkers before the tour buses arrived — empty, wind in your hair, the whole city laid out like a dirty carpet. Afternoon was one thing, not five: the Fundació Miró, quiet, strange, with a balcony overlooking Montjuïc. That's it. One deliberate choice instead of five frantic ones. The couple on their phones didn't know they had a choice.

Cost breakdown: what you actually pay for

The algorithm's weekend in Barcelona, if you price it honestly, runs about €280 for two people. Park Güell tickets: €20 each. Sagrada Família skip-the-line: €34 each. A paella dinner on a strip that pays 25% commission to TripAdvisor: €75 for two, with a bottle of mediocre Cava that costs €8 in a supermarket. Metro passes and two Ubers because you're running late: €22. Then there's the hidden cost. The couple spent 70 minutes waiting in total — for scans, for tables, for bathroom queues. That's 70 minutes of standing still, checking phones, feeling the heat. The local's alternative? Coffee and pastry: €6. Bunker walk: free. Fundació Miró: €22 for two. A late lunch at a bodega in Gràcia, where the menu is handwritten and the owner brings you a plate of jamón without asking: €32. No metro needed — everything was walkable by design. Total: €60. That's a €220 gap — but the real difference isn't money. The real difference is that the local route leaves you with room to breathe, to get lost, to sit on a bench and watch old men play cards in the shade. The algorithmic trip leaves you with receipts, photos, and a low-grade headache.

Satisfaction gap: why the cheaper trip feels richer

Here's the paradox that breaks the default logic: the couple who spent €280 rated their weekend a 6 out of 10 when I asked them at the airport. The woman said, "We saw everything," but she said it flat, like she was ticking off a task. The local's route, the €60 version, scored a 9. Not because of any single attraction — but because of what the algorithm can't schedule. A twenty-minute conversation with a shopkeeper about which olive oil is actually good. The accidental turn down a street with no tourists, where someone was playing flamenco guitar from a second-floor window. That sounds fuzzy, I know. The catch is: you can't measure serendipity, but you can measure regret. The algorithmic couple regretted rushing. They regretted not sitting still. The satisfaction gap — three full points on a ten-point scale — came down to one variable: control over your own time. When the app dictates, the trip feels like a job. When you dictate, the trip feels like a holiday. That simple.

'The algo gives you a list. The city gives you a moment. You have to choose which one you're paying for.'

— overheard in a Barcelona bar, from a retired architect who travels six months a year and never uses a review app

Reality check: name the tourism owner or stop.

When the System Fails: Peak Season, Solo Travel, and Accessibility

Overcrowding and its consequences

Barcelona in August—I made that mistake exactly once. The Sagrada Familia felt like a subway car at rush hour, bodies pressed shoulder-to-shoulder, phones raised in a desperate bid to capture something empty. The problem isn't 'too many tourists' in the abstract; it's that the experience collapses under its own weight. You queue forty minutes for a coffee. You skip the Picasso museum because the line wraps around the block. That sounds minor until you realize the whole day becomes logistics—not discovery. The machine sells you a ticket, then sells it to 5,000 other people, and shrugs when the seams blow out.

Peak season breaks something fundamental: the illusion that you're the only person here. And without that illusion, tourism feels like a factory floor. The fix? Well, you can't fix August. But you can pick shoulder seasons—May in Barcelona is a different city entirely. Or you can accept the crowd and recalibrate your expectations. One concrete trick: book the first entry slot of the day, when the turnstiles are still hungry. That buys you forty-five minutes of breathing room before the spillover arrives.

Solo traveler penalties

Traveling alone costs more. Not just emotionally—the cash penalty is real. A hotel room for one still costs the same as a room for two. Tour operators charge per person, but single supplements add 30–50% because the empty seat is 'lost revenue.' I have seen solo travelers pay double for a guided hike that a couple splits for half the price. The system assumes pairs. That hurts when your budget is fixed. Quick reality check—I once booked a 'private room' in a hostel that turned out to be a converted closet with a window facing an air shaft. The single supplement was listed as 'comfort fee.' It was not comfortable.

The penalty extends beyond money. Solo diners get the worst table by the restroom. Group tours assume you want to befriend strangers, and the guide's patter is tuned for couples. The catch is that solo travel also rewards resilience—table for one at a bar, no reservation needed, no small talk required. But the industry prices you out. Solution: book group accommodations that cap single supplements (some hostels, a few tour companies), or lean into street food and markets where tables are communal anyway. Not perfect. Cheaper, though.

Accessibility as afterthought

Let me be blunt: most tourism infrastructure treats accessibility as a checkbox, not a design principle. I have walked through 'wheelchair-friendly' museums where the ramp ends at a six-inch step. I have seen audio guides advertised for blind visitors that are just a recorded version of the wall text—no spatial description, no soundscape, no sense of the room. The system is built for the median body, and if you deviate from that median, the experience degrades fast.

'The accessible entrance was through the kitchen. Past the mop bucket. The chef was nice about it.'

— overheard at a Vienna café, traveler describing a 'fully accessible' hotel

The gap isn't just physical. Booking platforms rarely filter by true accessibility—they tag 'step-free' when the ramp is a shipping pallet. Peak season compounds this: accessible seats fill first, accessible hotel rooms are fewer, and the ones left are overpriced. A friend who uses a wheelchair told me she plans six months ahead for a weekend trip, just to secure a room she can shower in. That isn't tourism. That's logistics with a view. What usually breaks first is trust—you can't rely on the listing, so you call ahead, ask for photos of the bathroom door width, and still arrive to find a curb too high to mount.

One fix that works: search specifically for accommodations that post detailed accessibility audits, not just symbols. Call the front desk and ask one specific question: 'Is the threshold of the bathroom door less than half an inch?' If they hesitate, you have your answer. The system won't fix itself, so you patch the holes it leaves.

What Tourism Can't Fix

The Mirage of the 'Responsible' Tourist

You book the carbon-offset flight. You carry a reusable water bottle. You stay in a locally-owned guesthouse and eat at the market instead of the chain tapas bar. That sounds fine until you land in a city where the local government has already sold the waterfront to resort developers. The tricky part is that individual virtue-signaling doesn't reroute a cruise ship. I have watched travelers pat themselves on the back for skipping the hotel mini-bar while the destination itself drowns in short-term rental permits. The machinery of tourism runs on volume—your single 'ethical' booking is a rounding error in the ledger of an industry built on cheap flights and disposable experiences. The real choice isn't between good travel and bad travel—it's between traveling at all and the structural forces that make mass tourism possible.

Structural Inequality and the Leaking Bucket

Most of the money you spend never reaches the people who actually make the trip memorable. The guide who shows you the hidden courtyard? Working for a contractor. The woman who sells you handwoven baskets? She sees maybe 12% of the retail price. Top-down ownership patterns—hotel chains, tour conglomerates, foreign investors—siphon profit upward. Meanwhile, the local community absorbs the costs: rent inflation, water shortages, infrastructure strain. The catch is that 'travel with purpose' often just paints a smile on the same extraction model. We fixed this by paying guides directly and skipping the aggregator middleman, but that's a patch, not a cure. Systemic change requires policy—zoning laws, tax redistribution, caps on visitor numbers—none of which fit neatly into a packing list. A well-meaning tourist can't legislate a fairer split.

Environmental Costs You Can't Offset Away

Carbon offsets feel like absolution. They're not. They're a financial instrument that lets you pretend a long-haul flight is neutral. The reality is that a single round-trip from New York to Bangkok generates roughly 3.5 tons of CO₂ per passenger. That's more than the annual footprint of most people in the Global South. Offsets fund future reductions—they don't undo the jet fuel burned yesterday. The industry answer is always 'sustainable aviation fuel' or 'electrification,' but those solutions remain experimental, expensive, and years away. What tourism can't fix is the physics of burning kerosene at 35,000 feet. You can choose trains over planes for short hops. You can stay longer. But if you fly far and fly often, the math doesn't bend.

'I stopped calling myself an eco-traveler after I calculated my own flight miles. The label felt like a costume.'

— former travel blogger, now based in one region by choice

Odd bit about tourism: the dull step fails first.

The Limits of 'Voting With Your Wallet'

The rhetoric of responsible travel assumes the market rewards good behavior. Wrong order. The system rewards scale. One sustainable hostel barely registers against a 400-room chain that employs cheap labor and dumps waste. Your boycott of a single tour company doesn't dent their bottom line—it just makes you feel less complicit. The real leverage points are collective: unionized hospitality workers, government-enforced carrying capacities, visa restrictions on tourist housing. None of these are decisions you make at the booking stage. So what can you do? Stop pretending your personal choices fix systemic rot. Acknowledge that travel is inherently extractive. Then travel less, travel slower, and direct your energy toward policy advocacy—not just perfecting your packing list. The most honest trip might be the one you don't take.

Reader FAQ: Your Most Common Travel Headaches

How to Actually Avoid Hidden Fees

The sneakiest charges don't come from the hotel minibar. They come from currency conversion at the airport kiosk—the one you hit at 5 a.m. when sleep-deprived and desperate. That rate? Usually 8–12% worse than what your bank offers. I have seen people lose $60 on a €400 withdrawal. The fix: pull local cash from an ATM inside the arrivals hall, not the exchange counter. Decline the 'dynamic currency conversion' every single time—that's the trap where they charge your card in dollars at a garbage rate. Your bank's foreign transaction fee stings, sure. But it stings less.

Another quiet killer: 'resort fees' that appear only after you book. The hotel lobby looks fine until checkout morning, when the desk clerk slides you a bill for 'mandatory pool access' you never used. Quick reality check—always scroll to the bottom of Booking.com or Expedia before clicking 'Reserve.' Filter by 'total price including taxes and fees' in the settings. That one toggle saves you from a $45 surprise. And for Airbnb? Read the cancellation policy three times. The 'Moderate' policy is not moderate—it's a trap for weekend trips.

Is Travel Insurance Worth It?

Depends entirely on what breaks. The usual answer—'yes, always'—is a platitude that ignores your actual trip cost. A $200 insurance plan on a $400 flight to Dublin? That's half your ticket gone before you even pack. Here's the real rule: insure for the uninsurable loss. A missed connection you can rebook. A stolen phone hurts but doesn't ruin the trip. What does ruin the trip: a medical evacuation from a mountain trail in Peru—that's $50,000. Or a sudden family emergency that cancels a $3,000 safari you saved for two years.

The tricky part is reading the fine print on 'cancel for any reason' clauses. Most policies require you to cancel 48 hours before departure. That's useless when your kid spikes a fever at midnight on the night before. I have used World Nomads twice—once for a trip that got postponed by a wildfire. They paid out in eight days. Not fast. But faster than no payout at all. The catch: they don't cover 'known events' like an approaching hurricane. So if you see the storm on Wednesday and buy insurance on Thursday, you're out of luck. Buy it the same day you book the flight. That's the only move that works.

The worst travel headache isn't bad weather or lost luggage—it's the feeling that you're being ripped off in a foreign language.

— overheard at a hostel bar in Lisbon, after a $12 'service charge' appeared on a €3 coffee

Finding Authentic Experiences Without the Tour Bus Crowd

Wrong question. 'Authentic' is a marketing term hotels use to sell you a cooking class taught by a retiree whose grandmother's recipe is from the Ottolenghi cookbook. Better question: 'What do locals actually do on a Tuesday?' That starts with skipping the main square and walking two blocks sideways. In Barcelona, that means turning off La Rambla onto Carrer de la Boqueria—suddenly the €12 sangria becomes €3.50 vermouth at a bar that hasn't changed its tile floor since 1957. The trick is not the search for authenticity. It's the willingness to get slightly lost.

What usually breaks first is your phone battery. You navigate toward a 'hidden gem' listed on some blog, and the street is empty because the place closed last year. The alternative: ask three people—the hotel front desk, the bartender at 6 p.m., and the old woman buying oranges at the market. If two of them agree on a spot, go. If they disagree? Pick the one the bartender mentioned—he's not trying to sell you anything. And for god's sake, put the phone away for the last half-hour of daylight. That sunset isn't a photo op; it's the only time the city breathes. You might miss a 'must-see' on TripAdvisor. You won't miss the real city.

Three Things You Can Do Tomorrow

Reset your booking workflow

Most people start a trip by opening three browser tabs and panicking. Wrong order. The first click should be a calendar — your calendar, not the destination's. I have seen travelers book flights first, then spend two hours hunting for a hotel that doesn't require a 5 AM taxi. Flip it: lock lodging before the plane ticket. Hotels near transit hubs cost less than you think because they aren't beachfront. The catch is that airline algorithms punish indecision with price surges, so set a 45-minute timer for lodging. One concrete shift: use the 'map view' filter, not the 'popularity' sort. That alone kills the upcharge for convenience you didn't need.

Build slack into your schedule

We treat a 48-hour city break like a production deadline. Three museums, two neighborhoods, one sunset spot — and then a missed train derails the whole day. The fix is brutal but simple: plan for 60% of what you think you can do. Leave the other 40% blank. That sounds wasteful until you watch a couple sprinting through La Boqueria with luggage scraping ankles. Slack isn't laziness — it's the seam that absorbs a delayed bus, a closed plaza, or sheer exhaustion. A colleague once told me: 'I planned nothing for Sunday in Lisbon and that was the only day I remember.'

Learn to say no to the algorithm

Instagram feeds you a curated hellscape of the same three viewpoints, the same café with the neon sign, the same 'hidden gem' that now has a queue. The algorithm rewards density — cramming more stops into your day means more location tags, more dopamine. But density kills presence. Quick reality check — when did you last enjoy a meal you waited 40 minutes to photograph? I deleted the saved collections folder for my last trip to Seville. Wandered instead. Found a courtyard with one table, a woman selling oranges, and zero hashtags. That isn't a romantic ideal; it's a tactical choice. The algorithm can't price a memory it didn't sell you.

'The trip I planned perfectly was exhausting. The trip I left half-empty gave me something to come back for.'

— overheard at a hostel in Granada, after a traveler admitted her spreadsheet failed her

So here is the actionable part — tomorrow, before you open another booking site, delete three saved posts from your travel folder. Unfollow one 'travel inspo' account that makes you feel rushed. Then pick a single afternoon on your next trip and label it 'purposefully blank.' No reservations, no map pins, no obligations. That's not a loss of productivity. That's the hidden machinery of a trip working for you instead of against you. And the saved cost? A coffee you didn't overpay for, a bus you didn't need, and a night you actually slept before the next day's chaos.

Share this article:

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!